• 목록
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

Hell back in '09 Pornhub was running clean on a similar stack with only a few servers (when you consider the visitors).In case you ask me most of what was "invented" after 2004 is stuff invented by Google/Facebook who are realistically the only ones needing it, but they saw a possibility to scoop up market share in dev so that they marketed their stack as "bleeding edge". The only thing bleeding is my eyes when i see one thing that could be wiped up in an ordinary PHP/Python/Ruby stack but instead is made with so many dependencies and third get together library that you simply wonder if the dude who wrote it truly is aware of programming or if he just glued cool techs collectively because Techcrunch and HackerNews say they're cool.But sure, the smaller players are usually utilizing outdated stuff, then again 99% of the web is. Hence why Wordpress continues to be a factor.And as a former Lead Dev of Pornhub, I can assure you that tech peeps positively are aware of the bleeding edge of tech, just that most tend to not buy the hype.

Inventions that were ahead of their time can help us to understand whether or not we are truly ready to stay in the world we're making. Speculative fiction fans know which you could create a complete world out of just a handful of objects. A lightsaber can begin to describe a complete galaxy far, far away; a handheld communicator, phaser, and pill can depict a star-trekking utopia; a black monolith can stand in for a whole alien civilization. World-building isn’t about creating imaginary worlds from scratch - accounting for their every element - however hinting at them by highlighting mere facets that signify a coherent actuality beneath them. If that reality is convincing, then the world is inhabitable by the imagination and its stories are endearing to the guts. Creating objects in the real world is nearly precisely the identical; that’s why invention is a danger. When we create one thing new - truly, categorically, conceptually new - we place a wager on the steadiness of support it may have on this planet during which it emerges and the facility it should remake that world.

When a product fails as a result of it was "ahead of its time," that often signifies that its makers succeeded at world-building, not invention. It may very well be argued that Jean-Louis Gassée, not Jony Ive, xhamster invented the pill laptop, even though his Newton MessagePad failed soon after it launch in 1993 and is now mostly forgotten. In hindsight, it’s simple to see why Ive’s pad succeeded the place Gassée’s did not: twenty years of technological development provided better hardware, screens, batteries, software program, and connectivity. And even though anybody fascinated with a pill had probably been prepared for one since even earlier than the MessagePad due to the Star Trek universe being full of PADDs, the one factor that basically ready the world for the pill computer was the cell phone. In 1993, hardly anybody had a cell phone. By 2010, 5 billion folks used them. A world through which over 70% of its population is already accustomed to cellular computing is one prepared for a bridge system between a small mobile screen and a big stationary one.

The Newton MessagePad, in fact, isn’t alone. So many merchandise and technologies which can be commonplace as we speak made their debuts in merchandise that didn’t truly succeed. Not as a result of they weren’t good ideas, but because the world wasn’t quite ready they usually weren’t highly effective enough to make it so. The Nintendo Power Glove anticipated gestural interfaces and controls almost 15 years before Minority Report advised us all to expect them… ’re still not there. Microsoft’s Zune wasn’t the primary portable MP3 participant, of course; that distinction goes to the utterly unknown MPMan F10, released in 1997. It additionally wasn’t the primary really good or actually successful one; the iPod really should get the credit score for that. But, it did risk its id on a monthly subscription music service that the MP3 hoarders it was sold to simply weren’t prepared for. Google Glass was released in 2013 and died a humiliating however quick demise after a widely known tech bro wore it in the shower, reminding the world that face-mounted computer systems are made for a reality much creepier than any of us need.

But nearly a decade later, every major tech company is either making a face pc or is rumored to be making one. Times change. Things change. People change. The World Changes. In that order, after which time and again. There are, of course, many older examples. Much older ones, actually, just like the precise first vehicle - powered by steam - created by Nicolas-Joseph Cugnot over a century earlier than the first fuel powered car car introduced by Karl Friedrich Benz. Benjamin Franklin coined the term "battery" in 1749, but it wasn’t till half a century later that Alessandro Volta built one. And, it seems that the fundamentals of batteries were understood and in use over 2,000 years ago! But my favourite one is the PicturePhone. The fundamental idea of transmitting picture and audio over wire dates again to the 1870s (long before any of us had been warned by The Jetsons that video phones would drive us into a falseness that anticipated our completely curated Zoom backgrounds by many a long time). In 1927, Herbert Hoover (not yet President) made the first public video call from Washington, D.C.