• 목록
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

Last week, Utah Attorney General Sean D. Reyes joined 23 different states in a letter to Pornhub’s father or mother company with concerns over content featuring underaged youngsters. As just lately reported, an worker for the corporate was captured on video by an undercover journalist discussing Pornhub’s moderation practices, the place he admitted a "loophole." When uploading content material to the location, users are required to submit a photo ID but are usually not required to point out their face in the uploaded material. The employee admitted there is no solution to affirm the particular person importing the picture ID is identical person within the content material. He replied, "Of course," when asked if rapists and human traffickers use this loophole to upload content material of their victims to make money. As you're conscious, numerous Federal and state laws forbid the creation and distribution of CSAM (Child Sexual Abuse Material.) We're involved that Aylo and its subsidiary Pornhub, and probably other subsidiaries, could also be proliferating the production and dissemination of CSAM through the ‘loophole’ recognized by your employee. Please present us with a proof of this ‘loophole;’ whether Aylo and its subsidiaries do, actually, permit content material creators and performers to obscure their faces in uploaded content material; and, in that case, whether or not Aylo is taking measures to vary this policy to make sure that no youngsters or other victims are being abused for revenue on any of its platforms.

Inventions that have been ahead of their time might help us to grasp whether we are really ready to stay in the world we're making. Speculative fiction fans know that you may create a complete world out of just a handful of objects. A lightsaber can begin to explain a whole galaxy far, far away; a handheld communicator, phaser, and pill can depict a star-trekking utopia; a black monolith can stand in for a complete alien civilization. World-building isn’t about creating imaginary worlds from scratch - accounting for his or her each detail - but hinting at them by highlighting mere sides that symbolize a coherent reality beneath them. If that actuality is convincing, then the world is inhabitable by the imagination and its stories are endearing to the guts. Creating objects in the true world is almost precisely the same; that’s why invention is a threat. After we create something new - really, categorically, conceptually new - we place a wager on the balance of support it may have on the earth wherein it emerges and the power it will have to remake that world.

When a product fails because it was "ahead of its time," that usually means that its makers succeeded at world-building, not invention. It could be argued that Jean-Louis Gassée, not Jony Ive, invented the pill pc, regardless that his Newton MessagePad failed soon after it launch in 1993 and is now mostly forgotten. In hindsight, it’s straightforward to see why Ive’s pad succeeded where Gassée’s did not: twenty years of technological improvement provided higher hardware, screens, batteries, software, and connectivity. And xnxx though anyone keen on a pill had in all probability been prepared for one since even before the MessagePad due to the Star Trek universe being full of PADDs, the one thing that basically ready the world for the tablet laptop was the cell phone. In 1993, hardly anybody had a cell phone. By 2010, 5 billion folks used them. A world wherein over 70% of its inhabitants is already accustomed to cell computing is one ready for a bridge device between a small mobile display and a large stationary one.

The Newton MessagePad, in fact, isn’t alone. So many products and applied sciences which might be commonplace as we speak made their debuts in products that didn’t actually succeed. Not because they weren’t good concepts, however because the world wasn’t fairly prepared and they weren’t highly effective enough to make it so. The Nintendo Power Glove anticipated gestural interfaces and controls virtually 15 years earlier than Minority Report advised us all to anticipate them… ’re nonetheless not there. Microsoft’s Zune wasn’t the primary portable MP3 player, after all; that distinction goes to the utterly unknown MPMan F10, released in 1997. It additionally wasn’t the primary actually good or actually profitable one; the iPod really ought to get the credit score for that. But, it did threat its identity on a month-to-month subscription music service that the MP3 hoarders it was bought to just weren’t ready for. Google Glass was released in 2013 and died a humiliating but quick death after a widely known tech bro wore it within the shower, reminding the world that face-mounted computers are made for a reality a lot creepier than any of us want.

But almost a decade later, every main tech company is either making a face laptop or is rumored to be making one. Times change. Things change. People change. The World Changes. In that order, after which over and over again. There are, of course, many older examples. Much older ones, actually, just like the precise first vehicle - powered by steam - created by Nicolas-Joseph Cugnot over a century before the first fuel powered vehicle automobile introduced by Karl Friedrich Benz. Benjamin Franklin coined the term "battery" in 1749, but it surely wasn’t until half a century later that Alessandro Volta built one. And, it seems that the basics of batteries were understood and in use over 2,000 years ago! But my favorite one is the PicturePhone. The essential concept of transmitting picture and audio over wire dates back to the 1870s (long earlier than any of us had been warned by The Jetsons that video telephones would pressure us into a falseness that anticipated our perfectly curated Zoom backgrounds by many many years). In 1927, Herbert Hoover (not yet President) made the primary public video call from Washington, D.C.